The detailed and comprehensive Invalidity search report enables clients for highly sensitive litigation, opposition, and patent acquisition cases where a high-definition claim chart is required to ease the attorney’s efforts. Before going for any invalidity search, we analyze the subject patent case in-depth using litigation/ opposition documents (if any), file wrapper, etc., to build a sound understanding of the case. We categorize the identified references into three categories “X”, “Y”, and “A”, as per the international search report (ISR).
• “X” Category: Novelty or Inventiveness in one reference.
• “Y” Category: If novelty or inventiveness is lacking in one document; two or more references are identified to generate a claim chart.
• “A” category: This category references background art that neither discloses any novelty nor inventiveness.
IeB’s Invalidity search report is enabled with a feature matrix generated for each feature. This enables attorneys to have a quick walk-through of fully supported, partially supported, inferentially supported, and non-supported features. Below are the strategies applied for an exhaustive Invalidity search.
Why is Patent Invalidation Study Imperative?
• To invalidate the claims of a patent through a prior art search.
• To check the potency of a granted patent.
• To assess the validity of an established patent.
Why Ingenious for Invalidation Search?
• We employ robust analytical tools to perform an exhaustive patent search.
• We have access to paid non-patent databases, such as IEEE, Scopus, web of science, etc.
• We include all the relevant references that target innovation and non-obviousness.
• Class translation to Japanese and Korean.
• We offer multiple native language search options for our global clients.
For more information, please visit below page and schedule a call with our experts@
https://www.iebrain.com/ipintelligence/invalidation-study/
Invalidity SearchPatent InvalidityOpposition Search
